1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 23 Wis.2d
  5. 23 Wis.2d 649 (1964)
 

SCHNECK v. MUTUAL SERVICE CAS. INS. CO.

23 Wis.2d 649 (1964)

SCHNECK, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Respondents, v. MUTUAL SERVICE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. TOWLE, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Respondents, v. SAME, Appellant. BRANDT, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Respondents, v. SAME, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 28, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Smith, Puchner, Tinkham & Smith of Wausau, and oral argument by Richard P. Tinkham.

For the respondents there was a brief by Kelley & Maeder of Wausau, for the Brandts, and Walter A. Graunke of Wausau, for the Schnecks, and Crooks & Crooks of Wausau, for the Towles, and oral argument by Mr. Jerome A. Maeder, Mr. Graunke, and Mr. Leo D. Crooks.

BEILFUSS, J.

The principal issues are:

1. Is there sufficient credible evidence to sustain the verdict?

2. Was argument to the jury by plaintiffs' counsel so improper as to require a new trial?

Sufficiency of the Evidence.

The factual situation as it appears in the record before us is essentially the same as reported in the first appeal. Briefly stated, the facts are: The plaintiff, Patricia Brandt, is the minor daughter of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases