1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 327 F.2d
  5. 327 F.2d 338 (1964)
 

UNITED STATES TIME CORPORATION v. HAMILTON WATCH COMPANY

No. 310, Docket 28572.

327 F.2d 338 (1964)

The UNITED STATES TIME CORPORATION, a Connecticut corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAMILTON WATCH COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided January 31, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Hoxie, New York City (Eliot S. Gerber, Davis, Hoxie, Faithfull & Hapgood, New York City, Walter F. Torrance, Jr., Carmody & Torrance, Waterbury, Conn., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert E. LeBlanc, LeBlanc & Shur, Washington, D. C. (Richard A. Whiting, Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, D. C., William L. F. Felstiner, Gumbart, Corbin, Tyler & Cooper, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court the order of the district court. The question for decision is whether the district judge properly exercised his discretion in denying plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the defendant from prosecuting in the District of Maryland a suit against a customer of the plaintiff for infringement of certain of the defendant's patents, and from commencing any like action against any other customer of the plaintiff. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases