HOLLERMAN v. F. H. PEAVEY & COMPANY

No. 39210.

130 N.W.2d 534 (1964)

Norbert HOLLERMAN and Julia Hollerman, Respondents, v. F. H. PEAVEY & COMPANY et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 28, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cant, Haverstock, Beardsley, Gray & Plant, Franklin D. Gray, Dorsey, Owen, Marquart, Windhorst & West, Peter Dorsey, Robins, Davis & Lyons and Elliot S. Kaplan, Bernard Rosenberg, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Ryan, Ryan & Ebert, Donald I. Ryan, Brainerd, for respondents.


MURPHY, Justice.

This case is before us on an appeal from an order denying a motion of defendants for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial in an action for damages for fraud. Numerous errors are alleged, three of which we consider. Defendants assert (1) that the record fails to establish fraud; (2) that the court erred in permitting testimony relating to transactions between defendants and third parties; and (3) that the damages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases