1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 64 Wn.2d
  5. 64 Wn.2d 586 (1964)
 

ROTH v. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT DIST. NO. 5

No. 36679.

64 Wn.2d 586 (1964)

392 P.2d 1012

SIMON K. ROTH et al., Appellants, v. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 5, OF CLARK COUNTY, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

June 11, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robinson, Landerholm, Memovich & Lansverk, for appellants.

Schaefer & Wynne (Robert M. Schaefer, of counsel), for respondent.

HUNTER, J.

Plaintiffs (appellants), Simon K. Roth, Simon A. Roth and Mary Ellen Roth, entered into a contract with the defendant (respondent), Drainage Improvement District No. 5, of Clark County, which allowed the defendant to construct a drainage ditch across the plaintiffs' property. According to the contract the defendant was obligated to construct two cattle crossings, preserve an existing irrigation sump or move it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases