MILWAUKEE v. THOMPSON


24 Wis.2d 621 (1964)

CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Respondent, v. THOMPSON, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

September 29, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Roland J. Steinle, Jr., and Gregory Gramling, Jr., both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Steinle. For the respondent there was a brief by John J. Fleming, city attorney, and Theophilus C. Crockett, assistant city attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Crockett.


HALLOWS, J.

The urinalysis test showed 22/100 of 1 percent of alcohol by weight in the defendant's blood which amount under sec. 325.235 (1) (c), Stats., is prima facie evidence the defendant was under the influence of liquor. The defendant on this appeal contends: (1) That the proper test upon review where the trial court makes only a general finding of guilty is whether that finding is surported by the preponderance of the evidence, (2) that in the absence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases