This action is grounded on an allegation that the State, acting through the administrators of one of its mental hospitals, failed to abide by the provisions of sections 87 and 88 of the Mental Hygiene Law and that, as a direct result thereof, the claimant sustained serious injury. The State elected to rest at the conclusion of claimant's case. The court will adopt as established the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
