1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 333 F.2d
  5. 333 F.2d 287 (1964)
 

JACKSON v. DUNHAM-BUSH, INC.

No. 9236.

333 F.2d 287 (1964)

Earl R. JACKSON, Appellant, v. DUNHAM-BUSH, INC., Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., and Roche and Hull, Inc., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided June 10, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter G. Finch, Baltimore, Md. (Collins Denny, III, and Denny, Valentine & Davenport, Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellant.

John A. Mitchell, New York City (John W. Avirett, 2d, Baltimore, Md., Robert D. Spille, Garo A. Partoyan, and Curtis, Morris & Safford, New York City, on brief), for appellees.

Before BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This case involves the validity of patent No. 2,755,371 issued to the appellant, Earl R. Jackson, on July 17, 1956, upon application filed March 20, 1953, for a device for defrosting of refrigerators, deep freezers and cooling systems. The complaint charged infringement of the patent by Dunham-Bush, Inc., Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., and Roche and Hull, Inc., appellees. Injunction, accounting and damages were sought. Upon the issues of the patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases