BINZ v. ST. LOUIS HIDE AND TALLOW COMPANY

No. 31502.

378 S.W.2d 228 (1964)

Louis BINZ, Individually and as a Shareholder of St. Louis Hide and Tallow Company, a Corporation, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Shareholders, and for the Benefit of the Corporation, (Plaintiff) Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS HIDE AND TALLOW COMPANY, a Corporation, Albert J. Binz, Emma Binz, Leo J. Wilkes, William Brynda, William J. Wingbermuehle and Jack M. Cronin, (Defendants) Respondents.

St. Louis Court of Appeals, Missouri.

April 21, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Allen, Dominic Troiani, Lewis, Rice, Tucker, Allen & Chubb, St. Louis, for appellant.

Robert Mass, St. Louis, for St. Louis Hide and Tallow Co. and William Brynda.

Dubinsky & Duggan, Jerome F. Duggan, St. Louis, for Albert J. Binz, Emma Binz and Leo J. Wilkes.

Pannell & Hess, Phillip G. Hess, Festus, for William J. Wingbermuehle and Jack Cronin.


FRANK D. CONNETT, Jr., Special Judge.

This case arose from the following set of facts: In 1952, plaintiff's mother, Marie Binz, and defendants Albert J. Binz and William Brynda purchased a St. Louis rendering plant (Haefele Hide and Tallow Company), now known as St. Louis Hide and Tallow Company, the corporate defendant, on whose behalf plaintiff instituted this suit. The corporate defendant, St. Louis Hide and Tallow Company, a Missouri corporation, was in the business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases