1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 236 Or.
  5. 236 Or. 369 (1964)
 

CRAWFORD v. SEUFERT

236 Or. 369 (1964)

388 P.2d 456

CRAWFORD v. SEUFERT

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 22, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Mowry, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was David W. Dardano, Portland.

Bruce Spaulding, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Mautz, Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey & Williamson, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

This is an action for damages arising out of an automobile collision. The plaintiff appeals from an order setting aside a verdict in her favor and entering judgment n.o.v.

The sole issue is whether there was sufficient evidence to make out a jury question on the causal relation between the collision and the plaintiff's physical disorder. The plaintiff alleged in her complaint that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases