1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 235 Md.
  5. 235 Md. 368 (1964)
 

WHITE v. CATERPILLAR TRACTOR

[No. 399, September Term, 1963.]

235 Md. 368 (1964)

201 A.2d 856

WHITE v. CATERPILLAR TRACTOR COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 29, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel D. Hill, with whom were George W. White, Jr., and Buckmaster, White, Mindel and Clarke on the brief, for appellant.

Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr., with whom were Charles W. Gilchrist and Venable, Baetjer and Howard on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, HORNEY and MARBURY, JJ., and ANDERSON, J., Associate Judge of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, specially assigned.

HORNEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether a foreign corporation was "doing business" in Maryland so as to be amenable to suit in this State under Code (1957), Art. 23, § 92(a).

On October 3, 1962, Henry P. White, the plaintiff-appellant, sued Alban Tractor Company (Alban or dealer), a Maryland corporation, and Caterpillar Tractor Company (Caterpillar or manufacturer), the appellee, alleging a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases