MURRAY v. ELIZABETH ARDEN SALES CORP.


44 Misc.2d 555 (1964)

Ninna Murray, Plaintiff, v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corporation, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

November 24, 1964


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis, Gilbert, Levine & Schwartz (Philip K. Schwartz and Alfred M. Marks of counsel), for plaintiff. Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers (John J. Macchia of counsel), for defendant.


SAMUEL H. HOFSTADTER, J.

On the court's own motion, its memorandum decision dated October 30, 1964 is recalled and the following substituted:

Defendant moves for dismissal of the complaint with prejudice, on the ground that maintenance of the action is barred by the law of the case. In a prior action, plaintiff asserted a single cause of action for the recovery of unpaid compensation pursuant to an express oral agreement of employment. Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases