1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 226 F.Supp.
  5. 226 F.Supp. 368 (1964)
 

UNITED STATES v. DINERSTEIN

Civ. No. 20396.

226 F.Supp. 368 (1964)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. George C. DINERSTEIN, doing business as Associated Electronics Company, Harvey B. Levy, Louis L. Fragala and Technical Research, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

February 10, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome C. Ditore, Brooklyn, N. Y. (Joseph P. Hoey, U. S. Atty., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Morris K. Siegel, New York City (Vincent J. Crowe, and Siegel & Crowe, New York City, of counsel), for defendant Dinerstein.

Leonard Brodsky, New York City (Liebowitz, Deixel & Brodsky, New York City, of counsel), for defendant Levy.

DOOLING, District Judge.

Plaintiff in 1960 sued a government contractor under Section 19 of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944 (41 U. S.C.A. § 119) alleging that partial and final payments that it had made on certain terminated contracts in 1946 and 1947 resulted from the contractor's presenting invoices and certificates that were false in stating the costs and progress of the work, and resulted from the contractor's concealing from plaintiff the existence of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases