HUDSON FOAM LATEX PRODUCTS, INC. v. AIKEN


82 N.J. Super. 508 (1964)

198 A.2d 136

HUDSON FOAM LATEX PRODUCTS, INC., HUDSON CHEMICAL CORPORATION, HUDSON FOAM PLASTICS CORPORATION AND HUDSON CUSH-N-FOAM CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MEYER C. AIKEN AND NOPCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 10, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Burtis W. Horner argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Clifford J. Sheehan, on the brief; Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill, attorneys).

Mr. Willard G. Woelper argued the cause for respondent Nopco Chemical Company (Messrs. Toner, Crowley, Woelper & Vanderbilt, attorneys).

Mr. John J. Gibbons argued the cause for respondent Meyer C. Aiken (Messrs. Crummy, Gibbons & O'Neill, attorneys).

Mr. John B.M. Frohling, on the joint brief for respondents.

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and SULLIVAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs brought an action in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, seeking (1) to restrain defendant Aiken, a former employee, from performing services for defendant Nopco (a competitor of plaintiffs) for a period of one year, under a provision of the employment contract between plaintiffs and Aiken; (2) to restrain Aiken "from divulging any information to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases