CURTIS v. FABIANICH

No. 3451.

200 A.2d 382 (1964)

Arthur S. CURTIS, Appellant, v. Anthony FABIANICH, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided May 14, 1964.

Rehearing Denied May 28, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur S. Curtis, Washington, D. C., pro se.

John W. Brennan, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before HOOD, Chief Judge, and QUINN and MYERS, Associate Judges.


QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellant, an attorney, brought suit for professional services rendered appellee. At the close of all the evidence the trial court found that appellant had failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, either an express contract for compensation or circumstances warranting recovery in quantum meruit. This appeal followed.

The disputed claim involved a motion for a new trial which appellant agreed to prepare in a case involving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases