1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 231 F.Supp.
  5. 231 F.Supp. 347 (1964)
 

PUGLIANO v. STAZIAK

Civ. A. No. 64-78.

231 F.Supp. 347 (1964)

Pietro Mario PUGLIANO, Plaintiff, v. Paul STAZIAK, Peter Pollice, Leonard Monti, Enoc N. Johnson, Thomas Welsh, Vincent Tambura, Rita Henderson, and Marion Sarnic, Defendants.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

June 30, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pietro Mario Pugliano, pro se.

David W. Craig, City Sol., Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants, Paul Staziak, Peter Pollice, Leonard Monti and Enoc N. Johnson.

Rothman, Gordon & Foreman, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant, Marion Sarnic.

Lipsitz & Nassau, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant, Rita Henderson.

Louis Abromson, Daniel T. Zamos, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant, Vincent Tambura.

Richard C. Witt, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant, Thomas Welsh.

MARSH, District Judge.

On January 29, 1964, this member of the court granted plaintiff's petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and directed the filing of his complaint. The complaint alleges that defendants, Staziak, Pollice and Monti, acting under color of law in their capacities as police officers of the City of Pittsburgh, formed a conspiracy with defendant, Sarnic (a private individual), to deprive Pugliano of his constitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases