AEROJET-GENERAL CORP. v. AERO-JET PRODUCTS CORP.

Civ. A. No. C 62-899.

235 F.Supp. 341 (1964)

AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. AERO-JET PRODUCTS CORPORATION and Plasti-Kote, Inc., corporations, Defendants, v. GENERAL TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, a corporation, Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

September 30, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Guster, C. G. Roetzel, Wise, Roetzel, Maxon, Kelly & Andress, Akron, Ohio, D. Gordon Angus, Pasadena, Cal., for plaintiff and third-party defendant.

Robert J. Fay, Fay & Fay, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.


KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.

The plaintiff sued the defendants for an alleged infringement of its trademark, etc. Defendants filed a counterclaim charging plaintiff and the General Tire and Rubber Company, as a third-party defendant, with violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, Title 15 U.S. C.A. §§ 1 to 7. The General Tire and Rubber Company, hereinafter termed "General Tire," owns a controlling interest in the plaintiff.

Pursuant to Rule 33, Federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases