WHITLEY v. STATE

[No. 334, September Term, 1963.]

235 Md. 332 (1964)

201 A.2d 685

WHITLEY v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 23, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis J. Psoras, with whom was Burton W. Sandler on the brief, for appellant.

Fred Oken, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, William J. O'Donnell and Robert V. Lazzaro, State's Attorney and Assistant State's Attorney, respectively, for Baltimore City, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and SYBERT, JJ., and KEATING, J., Associate Judge of the Second Judicial Circuit, specially assigned.


PER CURIAM:

The only question involved in this appeal is whether the evidence was legally sufficient to support the conviction of the appellant, Wilbur Henry Whitley, for receiving stolen goods, i.e., the automobile which he was driving when arrested. The precise issue presented by Whitley is whether there was sufficient evidence from which the trial judge, sitting without a jury, could reasonably draw the inference that he knew the car — a Chrysler...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases