STAPLETON v. LOMBARDO


151 Conn. 414 (1964)

JAMES F. STAPLETON ET AL. v. CARMELLA LOMBARDO ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided February 25, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard I. Steiber, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Alfred R. Belinkie, with whom, on the brief, was Paul L. Blawie, for the appellees (defendants Lombardo).

Carl D. Eisenman, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Harold M. Mulvey, attorney general, for the appellee (defendant liquor control commission).

KING, C. J., MURPHY, SHEA, ALCORN and COMLEY, JS.


ALCORN, J.

This case is a sequel to Stapleton v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 149 Conn. 706, 183 A.2d 750. The basic facts appear in the opinion in that case and need not be repeated. After the decision, the Lombardos carried out their declared intention to seek the liquor control commission's approval of the removal of their restaurant liquor permit to a new location under the 1961 amendment to General Statutes §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases