GRIFFIN CONST. CORP. v. BD. OF ADJUST. OF TEANECK


85 N.J. Super. 472 (1964)

205 A.2d 313

GRIFFIN CONSTRUCTION CORP., ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK AND WILLIAM DUNLOP, BUILDING INSPECTOR, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 2, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. David B. Follender argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Jacob Schneider argued the cause for respondents.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEWIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

This is another in the series of cases before our courts in recent years involving the right of variance to build on a lot of lesser size or dimensions than those fixed as minimum for the zone by a zoning ordinance. Some of the decisions are unreported. Of the reported cases, see Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94 (1957); Burke v. Spring Lake...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases