WEIR v. HILL

No. 5-3253.

377 S.W.2d 178 (1964)

Max G. WEIR, Appellant, v. H. L. HILL, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

April 6, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis & Mills, Springdale, for appellant.

Scott & Davidson, Rogers, Kirsch, Cathey & Brown, Paragould, for appellee.


GEORGE ROSE SMITH, Justice.

This appears to be an action brought by the appellee to recover judgment upon six promissory notes executed by the appellant. We do not reach the merits, for under Rule 9 we are compelled to affirm the judgment. The appellant has submitted only a statement of the case, a list of the points relied upon for reversal, and a brief. There is no abstract of the pleadings, the judgment, or the testimony that was heard below. To determine the facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases