1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 23 Wis.2d
  5. 23 Wis.2d 532 (1964)
 

GLASSNER v. DETROIT FIRE & MARINE INS. CO.

23 Wis.2d 532 (1964)

GLASSNER and wife, Appellants, v. DETROIT FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 28, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Arnold, Murray & O'Neill, attorneys, and Glassner, Clancy & Glassner of counsel, and oral argument by Robert N. Gordon, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by Wickham, Borgelt, Skogstad & Powell, and oral argument by Clayton R. Hahn, all of Milwaukee.

FAIRCHILD, J.

1. Liability for the loss. Plaintiffs appear to have been uncertain whether the damaged pump was an item of contents or a part of the dwelling building. The coverage provisions applicable to contents are different from those applicable to the building. If the pump were an item of contents, plaintiff needed to establish that the loss was caused by one of several listed perils, one of which was fire. They attempted to prove loss by fire by the charring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases