NEDEROSTEK v. ENDICOTT-JOHNSON S. CO.


415 Pa. 136 (1964)

Nederostek, Appellant, v. Endicott-Johnson Shoe Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 1, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. McGinley, for appellant.

E. Drummond King, with him Robert B. Doll, for appellees.

Before JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.


OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS, July 1, 1964:

In this suit for breach of implied warranty of fitness, the court below granted defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings filed pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1034. Therefore, we must consider as presently admitted by defendants all well-pleaded allegations of fact in the complaint. Smith v. Brown-Borhek Co., 414 Pa. 325, 200 A.2d 398 (1964).

The crucial paragraph in the complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases