1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 23 Wis.2d
  5. 23 Wis.2d 523 (1964)
 

WILLENKAMP v. KEESHIN TRANSPORT SYSTEM, INC.

23 Wis.2d 523 (1964)

WILLENKAMP, Appellant, v. KEESHIN TRANSPORT SYSTEM, INC., and others, Respondents. HARDY, Appellant, v. SAME, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 28, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Urban P. Van Susteren of Appleton.

For the respondents there was a brief by Bradford & Gabert of Appleton, and oral argument by Stanley R. Gabert.

CURRIE, C. J.

Three issues are raised on this appeal:

(1) Did the trial court commit prejudicial error in its instructions to the jury?

(2) Did the jury's answers to the damage questions of the verdict evince such perversity as to require a new trial on all issues?

(3) Should this court exercise its discretionary power to order a new trial in the interest of justice?

The Instructions to the Jury.

As previously stated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases