WHERRY v. LACEY


236 Or. 307 (1964)

388 P.2d 279

WHERRY ET UX v. LACEY ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 15, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger N. Rook, Milwaukie, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Erlandson & Rook, Milwaukie.

James M. Burns, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Benson, Whitely, McLennan & Burns, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action by landlords to recover possession of land from their tenants.

The trial court found that while the written lease under which the tenants had gone into possession had expired, it had been renewed by an oral agreement, and that in reliance upon such agreement, the tenants had made valuable improvements. Upon these facts, the court held that it would be inequitable to oust the tenants. The landlords appeal from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases