EMMAUS MUN. AUTH. v. ELTZ


416 Pa. 123 (1964)

Emmaus Municipal Authority v. Eltz, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

December 3, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry A. Dower, with him Eugene J. Gorman, Edward N. Cahn, and Dower, Kanehann, Huston, McDonald & Cahn, and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, for appellants.

Theodore R. Gardner, with him Edward H. McGee, for municipal authority, appellee.

Before BELL, C.J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.


OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE O'BRIEN, December 3, 1964:

The plaintiff-appellee filed a complaint in assumpsit in which it alleged that the defendant had breached the terms of two contracts. The defendants then filed, on the plaintiff, a rule to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed.1 The petition for the rule alleged that the contracts signed by the parties provided for arbitration; hence the action in assumpsit was premature...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases