1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 226 Cal.App.2d
  5. 226 Cal.App.2d 309 (1964)
 

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON CO. v. IND. ACC. COM.

Docket No. 27824.

226 Cal.App.2d 309 (1964)

38 Cal. Rptr. 57

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION and CLYDE D. COPLIN, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

April 14, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawler, Felix & Hall, Kenneth B. Wright and Douglas Van Dyke for Petitioner.

E. Herbert Herlihy and F. George Herlihy as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.

Everett A. Corten, Edward A. Sarkisian, Silver, McWilliams & Sherman and Richard L. McWilliams for Respondents.

FORD, J.

The sole question presented in this matter is whether the commission erred in its determination that the contract of hire pursuant to which the respondent Clyde D. Coplin worked for the petitioner Chicago Bridge & Iron Company was made in California and that, accordingly, the commission had jurisdiction with respect to an injury to Mr. Coplin which occurred in Nevada.1

The articles of agreement between the union to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases