Per Curiam.
Basically, in this appeal appellant claims that the Court of Appeals denied him due process and equal protection in that it did not properly consider his petition for habeas corpus.
The questions raised by appellant's claimed errors by the Court of Appeals in relation to his unlawful detention and denial of effective assistance of counsel are determinable only as a matter of fact. There is neither a bill of exceptions from
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
