1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 176 Ohio
  5. 176 Ohio St. 349 (1964)
 

STATE, EX REL. HALL CHINA CO. v. INDUS. COMM.

Nos. 38594 and 38595.

176 Ohio St. 349 (1964)

THE STATE, EX REL. THE HALL CHINA CO., APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. (Two cases.)

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 17, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Mr. Russell P. Herrold, Jr., Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey and Mr. William C. Hartman, for appellant.

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, Mr. Robert M. Duncan and Mr. Robert N. Wistner, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The Industrial Commission, a fact-finding administrative agency, has made factual determinations in these causes. This court cannot say, from an examination of the records, that the commission abused its discretion in making such findings. A clear legal right to writs of mandamus has not been established.

The judgments of the Court of Appeals are affirmed.

Judgments affirmed....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases