BLUMENFELD v. CITY OF NEW YORK


44 Misc.2d 475 (1964)

Helma Blumenfeld et al., Doing Business as Blumenfeld & Richman, Plaintiffs, v. City of New York et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

November 5, 1964


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip Smith for plaintiffs. Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel, for defendants.


SAMUEL H. HOFSTADTER, J.

In this taxpayers' action, plaintiffs, owners of 327-35 East 29 Street, Manhattan, would have the court exclude these premises from the Bellevue South Urban Renewal Project — contending that the property is an oasis in the blighted area to be rehabilitated. The motion before me is for a preliminary injunction restraining the city and its officials from vesting title in the city in the pending condemnation proceeding until...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases