WeGO PERFORATORS v. HILLIGOSS

No. 40632.

397 P.2d 113 (1964)

WeGO PERFORATORS, a co-partnership, Plaintiff in Error, v. Leonard HILLIGOSS, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

November 17, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Conn & Mayhue, by R. Burl Harris, Ada, for plaintiff in error.

Paul Ballinger, Holdenville, Dick Bell, Frank Seay, Seminole, for defendant in error.


JOHNSON, Justice.

The defendant in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, was the owner and operator of an oil well. The plaintiff in error was a co-partnership engaged in operating a specialized oilfield service, and hereafter is referred to as defendant.

In the course of his operations, the plaintiff employed the defendant, admittedly an independent contractor, to perforate and "shoot" certain sand formations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases