CARAMICO v. FERRIGNO


83 N.J. Super. 426 (1964)

200 A.2d 338

DOMINIC CARAMICO, AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ETHEL CARAMICO, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. VINCENZO FERRIGNO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 4, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John Selawsky argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Marcus & Levy, attorneys).

Mr. Wood M. DeYoe argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Stalter, Doan & DeYoe, attorneys; Mr. Aaron Dines on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, FOLEY and LEWIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant entered upon a jury verdict of no cause of action.

The action was brought by Ethel Caramico as guardian ad litem of her son Dominic, 3 1/2 years of age, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the child when he was struck by an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. The mother sued per quod.

A brief recital of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases