1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 377 U.S.
  5. 377 U.S. 126 (1964)
 

HATTIESBURG UNIONS v. BROOME CO.

No. 669.

377 U.S. 126 (1964)

HATTIESBURG BUILDING & TRADES COUNCIL ET AL. v. BROOME, DOING BUSINESS AS BROOME CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE CO., ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 27, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ralph N. Jackson for petitioners.

Richard C. Keenan for respondents.

Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for the United States, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.

PER CURIAM.

After finding that the primary employer was not in commerce and ruling that the pre-emption rule of San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236, was therefore not applicable, the state court enjoined picketing at the premises of the secondary employer. The judgment must be reversed. The jurisdictional standards established by the National Labor Relations Board (see 23 N. L. R. B. Ann. Rep. 8 ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases