1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 330 F.2d
  5. 330 F.2d 164 (1964)
 

MARVEL SPECIALTY COMPANY v. BELL HOSIERY HILLS, INC.

No. 9112.

330 F.2d 164 (1964)

MARVEL SPECIALTY COMPANY, Inc., Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. BELL HOSIERY HILLS, INC., Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 3, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Conrad, Washington, D. C. (Watson, Cole, Grindle & Watson, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellant and cross-appellee.

Clifton T. Hunt, Jr., Charlotte, N. C. (Paul B. Bell and Eaton, Bell, Hunt & Seltzer, Charlotte, N. C., on brief), for appellee and cross-appellant.

Before HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges, and BARKSDALE, District Judge.

BOREMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for patent infringement. The District Court found the patent valid and infringed by one accused device but not infringed by another. Both parties have appealed.

The patent in suit is United States patent No. 2,570,637, entitled "Method of and Apparatus for Mending Hosiery" issued to Merle M. Brown in October of 1951 and relates to a method and machine for repairing "pulled threads" in knitted fabrics. However, at the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases