1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 24 Wis.2d
  5. 24 Wis.2d 467 (1964)
 

JAMES v. STATE

24 Wis.2d 467 (1964)

JAMES, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 30, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Patri, Nolan, Crane & Engler and Gary R. Yakes, all of Oshkosh, and oral argument by Mr. Yakes.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown and William A. Platz, assistant attorneys general, with whom on the brief was George Thompson, attorney general.

HALLOWS, J.

The writ of error required the three cases to be returned to this court. In its brief the state argues the writ of error should be dismissed because this court cannot review three judgments in separate cases on one writ of error although this is done in respect to counts in a single case. We have this day in Ronzani v. State, ante, p. 512, 129 N.W.2d 143, decided that the irregularity of attempting to have several judgments of conviction or sentencing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases