1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 226 Cal.App.2d
  5. 226 Cal.App.2d 263 (1964)
 

MOCK v. SHULMAN

Docket No. 26737.

226 Cal.App.2d 263 (1964)

38 Cal. Rptr. 39

HAROLD J. MOCK et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. HAROLD SHULMAN et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

April 10, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Savitch and Benjamin E. King for Defendants and Appellants.

Moore & Moore and Robert H. Moore for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

SHINN, P.J.

Plaintiffs brought this action for damages and to restrain defendants from maintaining a thick growth of a line of 16 Forbes Cypress trees which were blocking their view. From a judgment awarding damages and granting an injunction, defendants appeal.

Plaintiffs Harold and Ruth Mock and defendants Harold and Beverly King Shulman are adjacent property owners of hillside lots. Mocks' property is immediately to the north and above the Shulman property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases