IN RE HOLTZ

No. C.D. 1926.

64 Wn.2d 424 (1964)

392 P.2d 242

In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceeding Against LLOYD HOLTZ, an Attorney at Law.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

May 14, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

T.M. Royce, for Board of Governors.

Max R. Nicolai, for respondent.


HALE, J.

Indolence, laziness, negligence in the gross, want of diligence — these deficiencies in an attorney are as costly to a client in the loss or curtailment of his rights as they are burdensome to the profession and the courts in general. Because these shortcomings may have the same damaging effect as does professional incompetence, or even conduct involving moral turpitude, they are quite properly, in extreme...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases