1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 23 Wis.2d
  5. 23 Wis.2d 462 (1964)
 

PAGEL v. KEES

23 Wis.2d 462 (1964)

PAGEL, Respondent, v. KEES and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 28, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Hofmeister & Engler, and Benton, Bosser, Fulton, Menn & Nehs, attorneys, and Peter S. Nelson of counsel, all of Appleton, and oral argument by Mr. David L. Fulton and Mr. Nelson.

For the respondent there was a brief by Bonk, Lutz & Hertel of Chilton, and oral argument by Robert Lutz and William Hertel.

HALLOWS, J.

The first contention made by Kees is the negligence of Pagel as a matter of law was at least equal to his negligence. Since neither Pagel nor Kees was able to testify as to lookout immediately prior to the collision because of amnesia, both could be found guilty of causal negligence, but in so finding under an ultimate-fact verdict, the jury could consider them guilty as to either lookout or management and control...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases