1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.H.
  4. 105 N.H.
  5. 105 N.H. 380 (1964)
 

HOYT v. HORST

No. 5201.

105 N.H. 380 (1964)

CECILE GOSSELIN HOYT v. VICTOR F. HORST, d/b/a ARTHUR MURRAY STUDIO OF MANCHESTER & a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 2, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sheehan, Phinney, Bass, Green & Bergevin (Mr. Gerard O. Bergevin orally), for the plaintiff.

Sullivan, Gregg & Horton and Charles F. Kazlauskas, Jr. (Mr. Kazlauskas orally), for the defendant Victor M. Horst.

David A. Brock and Devine, Millimet, McDonough, Stahl & Branch (Mr. Brock orally), for the defendant Charles T. Collins.

BLANDIN, J.

A fundamental issue before us is whether the Court properly left it to the jury to decide whether the defendant Horst was an undisclosed principal in the dealings between the plaintiff Mrs. Hoyt and the defendant Collins. To determine this requires a somewhat detailed examination of the facts.

Viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the plaintiff (Shimkus v. Caesar, 95 N.H. 286;...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases