1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 233 Md.
  5. 233 Md. 248 (1964)
 

HAMM v. STATE

[No. 130, September Term, 1963.]

233 Md. 248 (1964)

196 A.2d 464

HAMM v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 8, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Submitted on brief by Nelson R. Kandel for the appellant.

Submitted on brief by Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, Fred Oken, Assistant Attorney General, William J. O'Donnell, State's Attorney for Baltimore City, and Andrew J. Graham, Assistant State's Attorney, for the appellee.

The cause was submitted to BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and MARBURY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant raises three questions: (1) an alleged insufficiency of evidence; (2) prejudicial error by the trial judge in permitting the State to reopen its case and present additional testimony; and (3) error by the judge in refusing to strike out certain evidence. None of them has merit.

It would serve no useful purpose to set forth the evidence in detail. Two men walked into a branch office of the Western...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases