1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 23 Wis.2d
  5. 23 Wis.2d 453 (1964)
 

ADAMS v. JARVIS

23 Wis.2d 453 (1964)

ADAMS, Respondent, v. JARVIS and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 13, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Theiler & Seroogy of Tomahawk, and O'Melia & Kaye of Rhinelander, and oral argument by Donald C. O'Melia.

For the respondent there was a brief by Schmitt, Wurster & Tinglum of Merrill, and oral argument by Sverre Tinglum.

BEILFUSS, J.

1. Does a withdrawal of a partner constitute a dissolution of the partnership under sec. 123.25, Stats., notwithstanding a partnership agreement to the contrary?

2. Is plaintiff, as withdrawing partner, entitled to a share of the accounts receivable?

Withdrawal.

Sec. 123.25, Stats., states:

"DISSOLUTION OF PARTNERSHIP DEFINED. (1) The dissolution of a partnership is the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases