BARTLETT v. BARTLETT

No. 38263.

176 Ohio St. 299 (1964)

BARTLETT, ADMX., v. BARTLETT; SUNDERLIN ET AL., APPELLEES, ESHELMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 27, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Woodbury & Hendershott, for Helen N. Bartlett, administratrix.

Messrs. McIntosh & McIntosh and Messrs. Henry & Hoffstetter, for appellees.

Messrs. Laribee & Cooper, for appellants.


MATTHIAS, J.

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether a trial court on discovering after term that it made an error in its application of the law in its judgment may on motion by a party vacate such judgment and enter a new one.

This cause arose as a proceeding to determine heirship during the administration of an estate. Generally the administration of an estate is a continuing process until the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases