1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 228 F.Supp.
  5. 228 F.Supp. 245 (1964)
 

E. H. SHELDON & COMPANY v. NORBUTE CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 33889.

228 F.Supp. 245 (1964)

E. H. SHELDON & COMPANY v. NORBUTE CORPORATION.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 9, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew R. Klein, Synnestvedt & Lechner, Philadelphia, Pa., John T. Love, Wupper, Gradolph & Love, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Harold S. O'Brian, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., Lorimer P. Brooks, New York City, for defendant.

GRIM, District Judge.

Without much doubt plaintiff could have litigated the present patent infringement suit in the Second Circuit, but it prefers to litigate it here in the Third Circuit. Defendant, however, wants to litigate the case in the Second Circuit. Defendant contends that venue in this District is improper, but instead of requesting that the action be dismissed because of improper venue he has moved to have the action transferred to the Eastern District...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases