HANNA MINING CO. v. DISTRICT 2, ETC., ASSO.


23 Wis.2d 433 (1964)

HANNA MINING COMPANY and others, Appellants, v. DISTRICT 2, MARINE ENGINEERS BENEFICIAL ASSOCIATION, A.F.L.-C.I.O., and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 13, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Johnson, Fritschler, Barstow & Witkin of Superior, attorneys, and McCreary, Hinslea & Ray of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, and oral argument by Barney B. Barstow and by John H. Hanninen of Cleveland, Ohio.

For the respondents there was a brief by Borg, McGill & Moodie of Superior, and Pressman & Scribner of New York, N. Y., and oral argument by Douglas S. Moodie and David Scribner.


FAIRCHILD, J.

The gist of plaintiffs' claim, upon the merits, appears to be that MEBA's picketing, although nonviolent, is for an unlawful purpose, and plaintiffs are therefore entitled to an injunction. Allegedly, MEBA is attempting to coerce plaintiffs to bargain with MEBA as the representative of the marine engineers, against the wishes of a majority of the latter. The picketing is allegedly intended to induce others...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases