1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 220 Ga.
  5. 220 Ga. 226 (1964)
 

REED v. PEEPLES

22563.

220 Ga. 226 (1964)

138 S.E.2d 277

REED v. PEEPLES.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided September 11, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. E. Kinney, Pittman & Kinney, for plaintiff in error.

D. W. Mitchell, Jr., Herman Spence, Mitchell & Mitchell, contra.

ALMAND, Justice.

The sole question for decision is: did the trial court err in dismissing a motion for new trial because no complete brief of evidence had been presented to or approved by the court?

In a suit by I. M. Peeples against George Reed seeking equitable and legal relief the jury returned a verdict for the defendant on August 18, 1960. The plaintiff filed his motion for new trial on the general grounds and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases