1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 238 Or.
  5. 238 Or. 202 (1964)
 

SCHNELL v. APPLING

238 Or. 202 (1964)

395 P.2d 113

SCHNELL ET AL v. APPLING, OREGON AFL-CIO

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed September 1, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo Levenson, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants.

John J. Tyner, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, Salem.

Donald S. Richardson, Portland, argued the cause for intervenor-respondent. With him on the brief were Green, Richardson, Green & Griswold, Portland.

Roy F. Shields and James H. Clarke, Portland, filed a brief as amici curiae.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

This is a proceeding to enjoin the Secretary of State from placing an initiative measure upon the ballot for the general elections to be held November 3, 1964.

The plaintiffs contended that a measure which would substantially change the Workmen's Compensation Law was ineligible for inclusion on the ballot because of alleged defects in the initiating petition. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases