1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 224 Cal.App.2d
  5. 224 Cal.App.2d 212 (1964)
 

WEINSTOCK v. EISSLER

Docket No. 21181.

224 Cal.App.2d 212 (1964)

36 Cal. Rptr. 537

ALEXANDER WEINSTOCK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROLF EISSLER et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

January 22, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edises, Grossman & Grogan and Aubrey Grossman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Peart, Baraty & Hassard, Pelton, Gunther, Durney & Gudmundson, Clark, Heafey & Martin, Rankin & Anderson, Richard G. Logan, Robert D. Huber and Charles Goff for Defendants and Respondents.

SULLIVAN, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his third amended complaint after the court sustained general demurrers thereto with leave to amend and plaintiff failed to amend. Plaintiff also "appeals from the minute order herein dated September 5, 1962, ..."1 [1] An order sustaining a demurrer with or without leave to amend is nonappealable and the appeal must be...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases