1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 224 Cal.App.2d
  5. 224 Cal.App.2d 212 (1964)
 

WEINSTOCK v. EISSLER

Docket No. 21181.

224 Cal.App.2d 212 (1964)

36 Cal. Rptr. 537

ALEXANDER WEINSTOCK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROLF EISSLER et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

January 22, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edises, Grossman & Grogan and Aubrey Grossman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Peart, Baraty & Hassard, Pelton, Gunther, Durney & Gudmundson, Clark, Heafey & Martin, Rankin & Anderson, Richard G. Logan, Robert D. Huber and Charles Goff for Defendants and Respondents.

SULLIVAN, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his third amended complaint after the court sustained general demurrers thereto with leave to amend and plaintiff failed to amend. Plaintiff also "appeals from the minute order herein dated September 5, 1962, ..."1 [1] An order sustaining a demurrer with or without leave to amend is nonappealable and the appeal must be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases