MATTER OF UDDO (TAORMINA)


21 A.D.2d 402 (1964)

In the Matter of the Arbitration between Frank J. Uddo, Respondent, and Frank G. Taormina, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 18, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Mason of counsel (H. Richard Schumacher with him on the brief; Cahill, Gordon, Reindel & Ohl, attorneys), for appellants.

Hyman R. Friedman of counsel (Friedman & Friedman, attorneys), for respondent.

STEVENS and EAGER, JJ., concur with STEUER, J.; VALENTE, J., dissents and votes to affirm in opinion, in which BREITEL, J.P., concurs.


STEUER, J.

The parties to this dispute are stockholders and directors of nine affiliated corporations. The corporations, each in a distinct phase, are engaged in the food-processing business on a large scale. The business was originally in the hands of an individual, the progenitor of the Uddo family. He took in as a partner his son-in-law, the respondent Frank G. Taormina. Subsequently, the three Uddo sons and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases