DOMBROWSKI v. TOMASINO


24 Wis.2d 16 (1964)

DOMBROWSKI, Respondent, v. TOMASINO and wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 28, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by McCormick & Tessmer of Milwaukee, and oral argument by John E. McCormick and Henry A. Tessmer.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Kenneth J. Dunlap of Milwaukee.


GORDON, J.

The order which the appellants have challenged is not an appealable one, and therefore the merits of the matter are not properly before us. The issue of appealability was not raised by the parties, but nevertheless there is applicable what this court said in Yaeger v. Fenske (1962), 15 Wis.2d 572, 573, 113 N.W.2d 411:

"It is the duty of this court, notwithstanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases