1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 384 S.W.2d
  5. 384 S.W.2d 18 (1964)
 

HINDMAN v. STATE

384 S.W.2d 18 (1964)

Jimmy HINDMAN and King Shropshire v. STATE of Tennessee.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

November 12, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Witt, Gaither, Abernathy, Caldwell & Wilson, Chattanooga, James W. Gentry, Jr., Chattanooga, of counsel for plaintiff in error Jimmy Hindman.

Dietzen, Parks & Dietzen, Chattanooga, J.W. Dietzen, Chattanooga, of counsel, for plaintiff in error King Shropshire.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General, Marne S. Matherne, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, for the State.

BURNETT, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs in error, Hindman and Shropshire, were indicted under a two-count indictment charging (1) burglary of a business house and (2) charging receiving and concealing stolen property. The jury, after pleas of not guilty had been filed, found both defendants guilty of burglary in the third degree and fixed the punishment at not less nor more than three (3) years in the penitentiary. From this conviction each defendant has seasonably...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases