VERNAY LABORATORIES, INC. v. INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONIC RUBBER CO.

Civ. A. No. C 64-207.

234 F.Supp. 161 (1964)

VERNAY LABORATORIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONIC RUBBER CO. (Inc.), Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

September 15, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome F. Kramer, Schramm, Kramer, Sturges & Rees, Cleveland, Ohio, Stanley H. Foster and Albert E. Strasser, Yungblut, Melville, Strasser & Foster, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

E. E. Donnelly, Jr., John C. Oberlin, and J. W. Renner, Oberlin, Maky & Donnelly, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.


KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.

Defendant's request for an oral hearing on its motion for summary judgment will be denied since the Court can dispose of the questions presented without need of an oral hearing.

Defendant has moved for a summary judgment based upon the claim that patent No. 3,090,108, the patent which plaintiff charges defendant has infringed, is void and unenforceable.

In examining defendant's claim for summary judgment the Court is mindful...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases